2000 BMW 525 vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 BMW 525 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 BMW 525. (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 525 weights approximately 91 kg more than 1956 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (433 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 525. (331 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 525 | 1956 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 525 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 433 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3110 mm |