2000 BMW 528 vs. 1950 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 528 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1950 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 528. (279 Nm). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 1950 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 528 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4065 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3090 mm |