2000 BMW 528 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 528 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 528. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 528 | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |