2000 BMW 528 vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 528 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 528 (279 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 528 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 528 | 600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 47 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |