2000 BMW 528 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 528 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 528 (279 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 528 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 528 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |