2000 BMW 528 vs. 1999 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1999 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1999 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2000 BMW 528 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 528. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 528. (279 Nm). This means 1999 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 528 | 1999 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 528 | SS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 279 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3110 mm |
