2000 BMW 528 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 528 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. (286 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 592 kg more than 2000 BMW 528.
Because 2013 Dodge DURANGO is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 528. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (353 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 528. (279 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge DURANGO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 528 | DURANGO |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3042 mm |