2000 BMW 730 vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2000 BMW 730 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 730 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 730 (190 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 730 should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 730 weights approximately 761 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 730 (280 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 730 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 730 | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 730 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2430 mm |