2000 BMW 750 vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 750 would be higher. At 5,646 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 750 (387 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2003 Opel Omega. (143 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Omega weights approximately 118 kg more than 2000 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 750 (759 Nm) has 550 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 750 | 2003 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | 750 | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5646 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 387 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 759 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |