2000 BMW 750 vs. 2005 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 750 would be higher. At 5,646 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 750 (387 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 345 kg more than 2000 BMW 750.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 750 (759 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (342 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 750 | 2005 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 750 | SRX |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5646 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 387 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 759 Nm | 342 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2960 mm |