2000 BMW 750 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 750 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 BMW 750. (387 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 750 (759 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (536 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 750 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 750 | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5646 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 387 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 759 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |