2000 BMW 750 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 750 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 750 (387 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 750 (759 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2000 BMW 750 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 750 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 750 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 750 | UTE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5646 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 387 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 759 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |