2000 BMW M3 vs. 1942 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 1942 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 104.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3000 mm |