2000 BMW M3 vs. 1951 MG YB
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 MG YB would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1951 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1951 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1951 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 1951 MG YB | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | M3 | YB |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1250 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |