2000 BMW M3 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP) has 285 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW M3 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | M3 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
