2000 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP) has 272 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M3 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |