2000 BMW M3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 800 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |