2000 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 406. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1996 Peugeot 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Peugeot 406, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Peugeot 406. (130 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 1996 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | BMW | Peugeot |
Model | M3 | 406 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1618 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |