2000 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2006 Opel Antara. (212 HP @ 1400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Antara.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW M3. (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW M3. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 2000 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2000 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW M3 | 2006 Opel Antara | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | M3 | Antara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |