2000 BMW X5 vs. 1960 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 BMW X5 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 BMW X5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 135 kg more than 2000 BMW X5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW X5 | 1960 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 75 L |