2000 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2000 BMW X5 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW X5 (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW X5 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW X5 | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | X5 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |