2000 BMW X5 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 BMW X5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 BMW X5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW X5 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW X5 (281 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2000 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW X5 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | X5 | 200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
