2000 BMW X5 vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 2000 BMW X5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW X5 (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1997 Rover 400. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 400.
Because 2000 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW X5 (281 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW X5 | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | X5 | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |