2000 BMW X5 vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW X5 weights approximately 752 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Because 2000 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW X5 | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | BMW | Spyker |
| Model | X5 | C8 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 100 L |
