2000 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW X5 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 BMW X5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW X5.
Because 2000 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 281 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW X5 | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | X5 | Eos |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 55 L |