2000 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2000 BMW X5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW X5 weights approximately 208 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW X5. (281 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW X5 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X5 | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2776 mm |