2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z3 | 60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3230 mm |
