2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 244 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 1948 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1948 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | Z3 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |