2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 451 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | Z3 | F 89 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |