2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1954 Saab 92B.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1954 Saab 92B | |
| Make | BMW | Saab |
| Model | Z3 | 92B |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2480 mm |
