2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | BMW | Talbot |
| Model | Z3 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
