2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 79 L |