2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 770 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 79 L |
