2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1205 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Z3 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 163 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 2591 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 6050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 104 L |
