2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1961 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | Z3 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 31 L |
