2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1962 TVR Grantura
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 TVR Grantura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 TVR Grantura would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1962 TVR Grantura. (91 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1962 TVR Grantura. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 616 kg more than 1962 TVR Grantura. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1962 TVR Grantura | |
Make | BMW | TVR |
Model | Z3 | Grantura |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 65 L |