2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | Z3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 31 L |