2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (228 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (301 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | Z3 | EK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
