2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | Z3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 64 L |