2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | Z3 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
