2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 645 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z3 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 6952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 82 L |