2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (237 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | Z3 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
