2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1970 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 810 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1970 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z3 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3390 mm |
