2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1970 ZIL 114
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 ZIL 114 (254 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1775 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1970 ZIL 114 | |
Make | BMW | ZIL |
Model | Z3 | 114 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 6998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3770 mm |