2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1973 Chrysler Valiant

To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 227 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Valiant (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW Z3 1973 Chrysler Valiant
Make BMW Chrysler
Model Z3 Valiant
Year Released 2000 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2926 cc 5211 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 227 HP 227 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 461 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.1 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.6 mm 84.1 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2830 mm