2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | Z3 | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |