2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (210 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | BMW | Audi |
| Model | Z3 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
