2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 64 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | Z3 | 260 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |