2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 306 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | Z3 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |