2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | Z3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |